Multiparametric Cardiac MRI for the Diagnosis and Differentiation of Cardiomyopathy Phenotypes: Current Applications and Future Perspectives

  • Mykhailo S. Ishchenko Bogomolets National Medical University, Department of Radiology and Radiation Medicine, Kyiv, Ukraine; National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-7173
  • Mykhailo M. Tkachenko Bogomolets National Medical University, Department of Radiology and Radiation Medicine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-1566
Keywords: myocardial disease, imaging methods, Heart failure, phenotype, LGE, cardiac fibrosis

Abstract

Introduction. Cardiomyopathies are myocardial diseases characterized by structural and functional abnormalities in the absence of coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, or valvular pathology sufficient to explain the observed changes. Their origin may be either genetic or acquired. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the leading non-invasive diagnostic tool that enables comprehensive assessment of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue characteristics. The use of LGE and parametric techniques (T1-, T2-mapping, and ECV) facilitates the detection of fibrosis, infiltration, and edema. In 2023, the European Society of Cardiology introduced a phenotype-based classification in which CMR plays a central role, highlighting five main phenotypes: hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, arrhythmogenic right ventricular, and restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Aim. To demonstrate the key role of multiparametric CMR in identifying, differentiating, and prognosticating cardiomyopathies through analysis of characteristic CMR features and application of a systematic interpretative approach.

Review and discussion. Over the past decades, cardiomyopathy classifications have evolved substantially – from the basic morphological forms of the WHO/ISFC (DCM, HCM, RCM) to the contemporary phenotype-based model of ESC 2023. A pivotal milestone was the introduction of multiparametric CMR, which combines precise morpho-functional assessment with quantitative tissue characterization. CMR enables accurate evaluation of chamber volumes, ventricular function, and myocardial tissue changes (fibrosis, edema, infiltration) using LGE, T1- and T2-mapping, and ECV. The presence and extent of LGE are associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death, whereas parametric mapping techniques provide valuable diagnostic insights into diffuse myocardial processes even in the absence of contrast administration.

The current ESC classification distinguishes five principal phenotypes–hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, arrhythmogenic right ventricular, and restrictive cardiomyopathy. In all these phenotypes, CMR plays a central role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making.

In Ukraine, multiparametric CMR is gradually being implemented in leading cardiac surgery centers. However, wider adoption remains limited by the high cost of software, lack of dedicated workstations, and shortage of trained specialists. The future development of the method depends on protocol standardization, improved accessibility, and integration into national clinical guidelines.

Conclusions. Multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a key method for the diagnosis and differentiation of cardiomyopathy phenotypes. It provides a precise assessment of cardiac volumes, function, and myocardial tissue characteristics (LGE, T1-, T2-mapping, and ECV), enabling determination of disease etiology and differentiation of its variants. This technique is essential for accurate diagnosis, risk stratification, and selection of optimal management strategies for patients with cardiomyopathies.

References

  1. Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, Bilinska Z, Cecchi F, Charron P, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2008;29:270–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm342
  2. Arbelo E, Protonotarios A, Gimeno JR, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503-3626. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
  3. Report of the WHO/ISFC task force on the definition and classification of cardiomyopathies. Br Heart J. 1980;44(6):672-673. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.44.6.672
  4. Richardson P, McKenna W, Bristow M, et al. Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies. Circulation. 1996;93(5):841-842. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.5.841
  5. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2006;113(14):1807-1816. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174287
  6. Pinto YM, Elliott PM, Arbustini E, et al. Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice: a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(23):1850-1858. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv727.
  7. Arbustini E, Narula N, Dec GW, et al. The MOGE(S) classification for a phenotype-genotype nomenclature of cardiomyopathy: endorsed by the World Heart Federation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(22):2046-2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1644
  8. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Bucciarelli‑Ducci C, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1
  9. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2000.2011.
  10. Xu J, Yang W, Zhao S, Lu M. State-of-the-art myocardial strain by CMR feature tracking: clinical applications and future perspectives. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(8):5424-5435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08629-2
  11. Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8
  12. Marques MD, Weinberg R, Kapoor S, et al. Myocardial fibrosis by T1 mapping magnetic resonance imaging predicts incident cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(10):1407-1416. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeac010.
  13. Im DJ, Hong SJ, Park EA, et al. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(12):1562-1582. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0411
  14. Halliday BP, Baksi AJ, Gulati A, et al. Outcome in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Related to the Extent, Location, and Pattern of Late Gadolinium Enhancement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(8 Pt 2):1645-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.015
  15. Halliday BP, Gulati A, Ali A, et al. Association Between Midwall Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Mild and Moderate Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. Circulation. 2017;135(22):2106-2115. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026910
  16. Nealy Z, Kramer C. Imaging in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Beyond Risk Stratification. Heart Fail Clin. 2023;19(4):419-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2023.03.004
  17. Kiaos A, Daskalopoulos G, Kamperidis V. et al. Quantitative Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Sudden Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2024;17(5):489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.07.005
  18. Rudolph A, Abdel-Aty H, Bohl S, et al. Noninvasive detection of fibrosis applying contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy relation to remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(3):284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.064
  19. Weng Z, Yao J, Chan R. et al. Prognostic Value of LGE-CMR in HCM: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2016;9(12):1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.031
  20. Moon JC, Reed E, Sheppard MN, et al. The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(12):2260-2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.035.
  21. Liang L, Wang X, Yu Y, et al. T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume in Cardiomyopathy Showing Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: Differentiation Between Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:4163-4173. Published 2022 Apr 18. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S350673
  22. Pettersen MD, Du W, Skeens ME, Humes RA. Regression equations for calculation of z scores of cardiac structures in a large cohort of healthy infants, children, and adolescents: an echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(8):922-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.02.006
  23. Chen W, Qian W, Zhang X, et al. Ring-like late gadolinium enhancement for predicting ventricular tachyarrhythmias in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;22(10):1130-1138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab117
  24. de Frutos F, Ochoa JP, Fernández AI, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement distribution patterns in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: genotype–phenotype correlation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;25(1):75-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead184
  25. Perone F, Dentamaro I, La Mura L, Alifragki A, Marketou M, Cavarretta E, Papadakis M, Androulakis E. Current Insights and Novel Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques in the Prognosis of Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(4):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041017
  26. Hosadurg N, Lozano P, Patel A. et al. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation and Management of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2025;13(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102525
  27. Graziano F, Zorzi A, Ungaro S, et al. The 2023 European Task Force Criteria for Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Historical Background and Review of Main Changes. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024;25(9):348. Published 2024 Sep 24. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509348
  28. Gasperetti A, James CA, Carrick RT, et al. Arrhythmic risk stratification in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2023;25(11):euad312. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad312
  29. Corrado D, Basso C. Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2022;108(9):733-742. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316944
  30. Corrado D, Anastasakis A, Basso C, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: European Task Force consensus report. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
  31. Fouda S, Godfrey R, Pavitt C, Alway T, Coombs S, Ellery SM, Parish V, Silberbauer J, Liu A. Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Inherited Cardiomyopathies: Clinical Masquerade or Overlap? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(5):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051609
  32. Bariani R, Rigato I, Cason M, et al. Genetic Background and Clinical Features in Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4313. Published 2022 Jul 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154313
  33. Bozkurt B, Coats AJ, Tsutsui H, et al. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2021;27(4):387-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.022
  34. Ishida H, Narita J, Ishii R, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Genetic Analyses of Restrictive Cardiomyopathy in Children. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023;16(4):e004054. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.122.004054
  35. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schulz-Menger J. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology: a comprehensive summary and update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023;25: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00950-z
  36. Rojanasopondist P, Nesheiwat L, Piombo S, Porter GA Jr, Ren M, Phoon CK. Genetic Basis of Left Ventricular Noncompaction. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2022;15(3):e003517. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003517
  37. Alfieri M, Principi S, Barbarossa A, Stronati G, Antonicelli R, Casella M, Dello Russo A, Guerra F. How to Approach Left Ventricular Hypertrabeculation: A Practical Guide and Literature Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(3):695. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030695
  38. Petersen, S, Jensen, B, Aung, N. et al. Excessive Trabeculation of the Left Ventricle: JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging Expert Panel Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2023 Mar, 16 (3) 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.026
  39. Faber JW, D'Silva A, Christoffels VM, Jensen B. Lack of morphometric evidence for ventricular compaction in humans. J Cardiol. 2021;78(5):397-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.03.006
  40. Singh T, Carson K, Usmani Z, et al. Takotsubo Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Emerging Concepts, and Diagnostic Considerations. Circulation. 2022;145(10):e33–e45. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055854
  41. Goli R, Li J, Brandimarto J, et al. Genetic and Phenotypic Landscape of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2021;143(19):1852-1862. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052395
  42. Jackson AM, Bauersachs J, Petrie MC, et al. Outcomes at one year in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy: Findings from the ESC EORP PPCM Registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3055
Published
2025-12-25
How to Cite
1.
Ishchenko MS, Tkachenko MM. Multiparametric Cardiac MRI for the Diagnosis and Differentiation of Cardiomyopathy Phenotypes: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. ujcvs [Internet]. 2025Dec.25 [cited 2025Dec.26];33(4):78-3. Available from: http://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/796
Section
MYOCARDIAL PATHOLOGY AND HEART FAILURE