The Prognostic Value of the Coronary Calcium Score for Detecting Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis Based on CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. CT coronary angiography is a fast and non-invasive method for diagnosing coronary artery pathology. To standardize the assessment of CT coronary angiography results, the CAD-RADS (Coronary Artery Disease – Reporting and Data System) was developed, which is based on determining the degree of coronary artery stenosis. According to recent studies, in addition to CT coronary angiography, an important tool for cardiovascular risk stratification in asymptomatic patients is the assessment of coronary calcium score using the Agatston scale (CAC Score).
Aim. To assess the relationship and degree of correlation between the CAC Score and the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis when combining CAC Score and CT coronary angiography.
Materials and Methods. The data of 464 patients from the National Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery were analyzed. These patients presented with typical or atypical angina symptoms and had a low or moderate risk of coronary artery disease between September 1, 2024, and January 15, 2025. All patients underwent clinical examination, risk factor assessment, CAC Score evaluation, and CT coronary angiography. Patients with atherosclerosis were divided into two groups: those with non-significant stenosis and those with significant stenosis (≥50% in the left main coronary artery or ≥70% in the major epicardial coronary arteries).
Results. The study included 464 patients, predominantly male (55.6%), with a mean age of 59 ± 10.22 years. Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease was detected in 273 patients (58.8%). Based on the CAD-RADS, 24.54% of patients had CAD-RADS 1, 31.14% had CAD-RADS 2, 16.12% had CAD-RADS 3, 20.88% had CAD-RADS 4A, 5.49% had CAD-RADS 4B, and 1.83% had CAD-RADS 5. In the first group (non-significant stenosis), there were 196 patients (71.8%), while the second group (significant stenosis) included 77 patients (28.2%). The median CAC Score in the first group was 24.5 (1–103.25), while in the second group, it was 271.5 (88–666.5), p<0.001. A moderately strong positive correlation was found between the CAC Score and the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis (ρ=0.635, p<0.001). ROC curve analysis shows that the optimal cutoff value of the CAC Score for detecting significant stenosis was 282, with a sensitivity of 48.7%, specificity of 88.8%, and an AUC of 0.819.
Conclusions. The study identified a statistically significant correlation between the level of coronary calcification and the presence of significant stenosis. The CAC Score is a reliable prognostic marker for significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
References
2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews / Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, eds. National Academies Press (US); 2011. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24983062/
3. Emery C, Torreton E, Briere JB, Evers T, Fagnani F. Economic burden of coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease in patients at high risk of ischemic events in the French setting: a claims database analysis. J Med Econ. 2020 May;23(5):513-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.1715415
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;52(21):1724-1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
5. Ramjattan NA, Lala V, Kousa O, Shams P, Makaryus AN. Coronary CT Angiography. 2024 Jan 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. PMID: 29262000. Bookshelf ID : NBK470279
6. Haase R, Schlattmann P, Gueret P, Andreini D, Pontone G, Alkadhi H et al. Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data BMJ. 2019;365:l1945. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1945
7. Knuuti J, Ballo H, Juarez-Orozco LE, et al. The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. European Heart Journal. 2018;39(35):3322-3330. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267
8. Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADS TM 2.0 – 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2022;16(6):536-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.002
9. Greenland P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Erbel R, Watson KE. Coronary Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018Jul 24;72(4):434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.027
10. Kolesnyk MY. The role of coronary artery calcium estimation in the primary prevention strategy for cardiovascular diseases. Zaporozhye Medical Journal. 2023Sep.28;25(5):447-54. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2023.5.285583
11. Shreya D, Zamora DI, Patel GS, et al. Coronary Artery Calcium Score – A Reliable Indicator of Coronary Artery Disease? Cureus. 2021;13(12). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20149
12. Martin Bødtker Mortensen, Gaur S, Attila Frimmer, et al. Association of Age With the Diagnostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Ruling Out Coronary Stenosis in Symptomatic Patients. 2021;7(1):36-36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4406
13. Moradi M, Rafiei E, Rasti S, Haghbin H. Coronary artery calcification-does it predict the CAD-RADS category? Emerg Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(6):969-977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02082-w . Epub 2022 Aug 4.
14. Nykonenko AO, Makarenkov AL, Pidluzhnyi HS, Materukhin AM. The role and diagnostic value of assessing the degree of coronary arteries calcification for predicting the severity of coronary heart disease. Pathologia. 2021May 18;18(1):39-43. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2021.1.228855
15. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-T
16. Senoner T, Plank F, Beyer C, et al. Does coronary calcium score zero reliably rule out coronary artery disease in low-to-intermediate risk patients? A coronary cta study. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2020;14(2):155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.009
17. de Agustin JA, Marcos-Alberca P, Fernández-Golfin C, et al. Should computed tomography coronary angiography Be aborted when the calcium score exceeds a certain threshold in patients with chest pain? International Journal of Cardiology. 2013;167(5):2013–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.041
18. Erbel R, Möhlenkamp S, Moebus S, et al. Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(17):1397-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.030
19. Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, et al. Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Risk Classification for Coronary Heart Disease Prediction. JAMA. 2010;303(16):1610– 1616. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.461
20. Mortensen MB, Dzaye O, Bødtker H, et al. Interplay of Risk Factors and Coronary Artery Calcium for CHD Risk in Young Patients. JACC Cardiovascular imaging. 2021;14(12):2387-2396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.05.003
