Mini invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a case report
Keywords:
coronary artery disease, mini sternotomy, coronary artery bypass grafting
Abstract
Standard access in surgical myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary heart disease is traditionally a longitudinal median sternotomy. In order to minimize surgical trauma, length of hospitalization and rehabilitation of the operated patients are now more widely used minimally invasive approaches. We present a clinical case of a successful coronary bypass surgery performed in 57-year-old patient using mini sternotomy.
References
1. Ming Yang, Yang Wu, Gang Wang, Cangsong Xiao, Huajun Zhang, Changqing Gao. Robotic total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: seven-year single-center experience and long-term follow-up of graft patency // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2016. – Vol. 100. – P. 1367–1373.
2. Sabashnikov A., Patil N. P., Weymann A. et al. Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 46. – P. 48–55.
3. McGinn J. T., Usman S., Lapierre H., Pothula V. R., Mesana T. G., Ruel M. Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients // Circulation. – 2009. – Vol. 120. – ?. 78–84.
4. Cuenca J., Rodrigues-Delgadillo M. A., Valle J. V. et al. Is the fem?ral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? // Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 1998. – Vol. 14. – P. 111–114.
5. Moreno-Cabral R. Mini T-sternotomy for cardiac operations // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 1997. – Vol. 113. – P. 810–811.
6. Bonacchi M., Prifti E., Giunti G. et al. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operations? A prospective randomized study // Ann. Thorac. Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 73. – P. 460–465.
2. Sabashnikov A., Patil N. P., Weymann A. et al. Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 46. – P. 48–55.
3. McGinn J. T., Usman S., Lapierre H., Pothula V. R., Mesana T. G., Ruel M. Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients // Circulation. – 2009. – Vol. 120. – ?. 78–84.
4. Cuenca J., Rodrigues-Delgadillo M. A., Valle J. V. et al. Is the fem?ral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? // Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 1998. – Vol. 14. – P. 111–114.
5. Moreno-Cabral R. Mini T-sternotomy for cardiac operations // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 1997. – Vol. 113. – P. 810–811.
6. Bonacchi M., Prifti E., Giunti G. et al. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operations? A prospective randomized study // Ann. Thorac. Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 73. – P. 460–465.
Published
2016-12-02
How to Cite
1.
Todurov B, Bitsadze A, GlagolaМ, IvanukА, Demyanchuk V. Mini invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a case report. ujcvs [Internet]. 2016Dec.2 [cited 2024Dec.22];(3 (26):28-0. Available from: http://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/197
Section
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE
