Age- and Sex-Related Variations of Myocardial T2: Insights from Quantitative Mapping in a Healthy Ukrainian Population
Abstract
Background. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is recognized as the gold standard for non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization. Quantitative T2 mapping provides a direct measurement of myocardial transverse relaxation time (T2), which reflects tissue water content and serves as an objective marker of myocardial edema. Prolonged T2 values indicate increased free water content and are commonly associated with inflammation, ischemic injury, or with myocarditis. Unlike conventional T2-weighted techniques such as T2-STIR, which are prone to motion artifacts and subjective interpretation, T2 mapping enables absolute, reproducible, and quantitative assessment of myocardial tissue. However, reference T2 values remain insufficiently defined for the Ukrainian and broader Eastern European populations, particularly in pediatric cohorts. Establishing such reference ranges is crucial for accurate clinical interpretation and differentiation between physiological variability and early myocardial pathology.
Aim. This study aimed to establish age- and sex-specific reference values for myocardial T2 relaxation time in a healthy Ukrainian population and to evaluate potential influence of age and sex on these parameters.
Materials and Methods. A total of 310 healthy individuals (196 adults and 114 children and adolescents) underwent CMR on a 1.5 Tesla scanner using a standardized T2-prepared balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence. Measurements were acquired at mid-ventricular short-axis levels, excluding blood pool and epicardial fat. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics v26 and GraphPad Prism v10. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Group comparisons employed independent-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, or nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests as appropriate, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.
Results. The overall mean myocardial T2 value across the cohort was 45.1±2.7 ms (range 31-50 ms) with a normal distribution. In adults, mean T2 was 45.0±2.6 ms, and in children 45.3±2.8 ms (p>0.05). Age-stratified analysis among children revealed no significant differences between infants, early childhood, school-age, and adolescents (ANOVA F=0.16, p>0.05). In adults, women exhibited slightly higher T2 values than men (46.0±3.3 ms vs 44.6±2.2 ms; t=3.42, p<0.001), consistent with previously reported sex-related variability. In pediatric cohorts, no significant sex-based difference was observed (45.3±2.7 ms vs 45.3±2.9 ms; p=0.98). Visual analysis using boxplots and violin plots confirmed symmetric distributions, overlapping interquartile ranges, and the absence of age-dependent trends.
Conclusions. Myocardial T2 mapping using a T2-prepared bSSFP sequence at 1.5 T provides stable, reproducible, and physiologically consistent quantitative measurements across all age groups. The unified reference interval of 45±3 ms can be applied for both pediatric and adult populations. Slightly higher T2 values in adult women should be considered a normal physiological variation rather than a pathological indicator. These results establish foundational reference data for myocardial T2 mapping in the Ukrainian population and support its clinical use for accurate, contrast-free quantification of myocardial tissue characteristics across the lifespan.
References
- O’Brien AT, Gil KE, Varghese J, et al. T2 mapping in myocardial disease: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00866-0
- Carrabba N, Amico MA, Guaricci AI, et al. CMR Mapping: The 4th-Era Revolution in Cardiac Imaging. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:337. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020337.
- Gaizauskiene K, Leketaite K, Glaveckaite S, et al. Diagnostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping in Acute Myocarditis: A Systematic Literature Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 18;60(7):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071162
- Amano Y, Omori Y, Ando C, Yanagisawa F, et al. Clinical Importance of Myocardial T2 Mapping and Texture Analysis. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021 Jun 1;20(2):139-151. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2020-0007
- Topriceanu CC, Pierce I, Moon JC, Captur G. T2 and T2* mapping and weighted imaging in cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Nov;93:15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2022.07.012
- Xu Z, Li W, Wang J, et al. Reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Nov 16;25(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00974-5
- Kim PK, Hong YJ, Im DJ, et al. Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping: Techniques and Clinical Applications. Korean J Radiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;18(1):113-131. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.113
- Hanson CA, Kamath A, Gottbrecht M, et al. T2 Relaxation Times at Cardiac MRI in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):344-351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200989.
- Raad T, Morkovkina HY, Sydorova AV, Tsasiuk YY, Yalynska TA. T1 Mapping in Cardiac MRI: Principles, Techniques, and Reference Values of Native Myocardial T1 and Extracellular Volume in Healthy Subjects. Ukrainian journal of cardiovascular surgery. September 2025;33(3):138-150 https://doi.org/10.63181/ujcvs.2025.33(3).138-150
- Wiesmueller M, Wuest W, Heiss R, et al. Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 May 28;22(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x.
- Shaw M, Ojha V, Ganga KP, et al. Reference values of myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping values in normal Indian population at 1.5 Tesla scanner. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Nov;38(11):2403-2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02648-2
- Meloni A, Nicola M, Positano V, et al. Myocardial T2 values at 1.5 T by a segmental approach with healthy aging and gender. Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2962-2975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08396-6.
- Alsaied T, Tseng SY, Siddiqui S. et al. Pediatric Myocardial T1 and T2 Value Associations with Age and Heart Rate at 1.5 T. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):269-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02479-9
- von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schüler J, Dogangüzel S, et al. Detection and Monitoring of Acute Myocarditis Applying Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):e005242. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005242
- Real C, Párraga R, Pizarro G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging reference values for cardiac morphology, function and tissue composition in adolescents. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Mar 3;57:101885. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00062-7/fulltext
- Cau R, Falconi G, Suri JS, Saba L. T2 mapping in acute myocarditis: advancing quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for precision medicine. Clin Radiol. 2025 Sep;88:107007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2025.107007
- Jacobs HM, Soslow JH, Cornicelli MD, et al. Practice patterns of cardiovascular magnetic resonance use in the diagnosis of pediatric myocarditis: A survey-based study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024 Winter;26(2):101091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101091
- Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S, et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Mar;4(3):269-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.09.023


