Advantages of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Wartime Conditions

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63181/ujcvs.2025.33(4).13-21
Keywords: minimally invasive coronary artery bypass, minimally invasive cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, wartime, off-pump revascularization, mini-thoracotomy, coronary artery bypass grafting

Abstract

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is a promising surgical method for myocardial revascularization in coronary artery disease, performed via a mini-thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. In wartime conditions, the application of minimally invasive technologies gains special significance due to the need to optimize the use of limited resources, reduce blood loss, and shorten rehabilitation time. MIDCAB enables effective revascularization with minimal surgical trauma, which is critically important for military personnel requiring rapid functional recovery.

Aim. To justify the feasibility of implementing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass technologies to improve myocardial revascularization outcomes under resource-limited conditions during military operations.

Materials and Methods. The study included 42 patients divided into two groups: the main group (mini-access) – 16 patients (100 % military personnel) who underwent coronary artery bypass through a mini-lateral approach, and the control group (sternotomy) – 26 patients who underwent traditional CABG through median sternotomy. All operations in the main group were performed on the beating heart (off-pump). Analysis of intraoperative and postoperative parameters was conducted.

Results. The minimally invasive approach was associated with a statistically significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (140±17 ml vs. 200±50 ml, p=0.041), need for blood transfusion (6.2 % vs. 30.8 %, p=0.048), duration of mechanical ventilation (3.5±1.2 h vs. 6.5±2.8 h, p=0.001), ICU stay (1.0±0.2 days vs. 2.2±0.9 days, p<0.001), and total hospitalization (9.2±3.5 days vs. 13.8±5.2 days, p=0.003). The rate of postoperative complications was statistically significantly lower with the mini-access approach (6.2 % vs. 42.3 %, p=0.015). In wartime conditions, the off-pump MIDCAB technique allows procedures to be performed during power outages and in hospitals without full-service cardiac surgery departments, which is critical for decentralizing specialised care. Additionally, the reduced need for blood products preserves limited supplies for patients with massive combat trauma. No hospital mortality was observed in either group.

References

  1. Aboul-Hassan SS, Luszczyn M, Stanislawski R, Peksa M, Nawotka M, Amelchanka S, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Clin Med. 2025;14(21):7590. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217590
  2. Garg S, Raja SG. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting. AME Med J. 2020;5:25. https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.05
  3. Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Shafti TZN, El Al AA, van Kampen A, Amabile A, et al. Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation Surgery: A Focused Review of the Available Literature. Interv Cardiol. 2021;16:e08. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.05
  4. Marin-Cuartas M, Sá MP, Torregrossa G, Davierwala PM. Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery: robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass techniques. JTCVS Tech. 2021;10:170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.008
  5. Monsefi N, Alaj E, Sirat S, Bakhtiary F. Postoperative results of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure in 234 patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;9:1051105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1051105
  6. Manuel L, Fong LS, Betts K, Bassin L, Wolfenden H. LIMA to LAD grafting returns patient survival to age-matched population: 20-year outcomes of MIDCAB surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(4):ivac243. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac243
  7. Davierwala PM, Verevkin A, Leontyev S, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Holzhey DM, et al. Twenty-year outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: The Leipzig experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162(4):1123-1132.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.149
  8. Holzhey DM, Cornely JP, Rastan AJ, Davierwala P, Mohr FW. Review of a 13-year single-center experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass as the primary surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Heart Surg Forum. 2012;15(3):E122-E128. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111141
  9. Raja SG, Benedetto U, Alkizwini E, Gupta S, Amrani M. Propensity score adjusted comparison of MIDCAB versus full sternotomy left anterior descending artery revascularization. Innovations (Phila). 2015;10(3):174-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000162
  10. Stanislawski R, Aboul-Hassan SS, Marczak J, Stankowski T, Peksa M, Nawotka M, Cichon R. Early and long-term clinical outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting versus off-pump coronary surgery via sternotomy in isolated proximal left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score matching analysis. J Card Surg. 2020;35(11):3035-3044. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15056
  11. Stanbridge RD, Hadjinikolaou LK. Technical adjuncts in beating heart surgery: comparison of MIDCAB to off-pump sternotomy: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16(Suppl 2):S24-S33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/16.Supplement_2.S24
  12. Holzhey DM, Cornely JP, Rastan AJ, Davierwala P, Mohr FW. Review of a 13-year single-center experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass as the primary surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Heart Surg Forum. 2012;15(2):E61-E68. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111141
  13. Kiaii B, McClure RS, Stewart P, Rayman R, Swinamer SA, Dobkowski WB, et al. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(2):204-212. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.118682
  14. Leivaditis V, Mulita F, Baikoussis N, Kestenholz P, Vagionas A, Nikolaidou C, Galaktidou A, Alexopoulou V, Kalles V, Karampa D, Nikolaou I, Margaritis M. Forged in conflict: how wars and crises shaped cardiovascular surgery. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-02034-2
  15. Lazoryshynets VV. Military aspects of science and practice of Ukrainian cardiovascular surgery. Ukr J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;32(4):7-9.
  16. Gogayeva OK, Rudenko ML, Nudchenko OO. The occurrence of thrombotic complications due to combat trauma against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ukr J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;30(4):115-121. https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(04)/GR058-115121
  17. Gogayeva OK, Nudchenko OO, Malysheva TA, Shnaider LM, Tertychna AS, Stavinchuk VI, et al. Urgent cardiosurgical treatment of a military servant with a moving thrombus in the area of the left ventricular apical aneurysm (case report). Ukr J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;32(1):76-82. https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/24.32(01)/GN005-7682
  18. Novick WM, Mavroudis C, Jacobs JP, Karl TR. Ukraine: a cardiac surgical perspective. Cardiol Young. 2022;32(4):513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951122001317
Published
2025-12-25
How to Cite
1.
Kashchenko YV, Baylyiev AT, Kupchynskyi VO, Sargosh OI, Diadiun DM, Semeniv PM, Rudenko ML. Advantages of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Wartime Conditions. ujcvs [Internet]. 2025Dec.25 [cited 2025Dec.26];33(4):13-1. Available from: http://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/788
Issue
Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Vol 33 No 4 2025
Section
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>