Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Pregnancy

  • S. O. Siromakha National Amosov Institute of cardiovascular surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine; Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Iu. V. Davydova National Amosov Institute of cardiovascular surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine; Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology named after acad. O. M. Lukianova of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V. I. Kravchenko National Amosov Institute of cardiovascular surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Keywords: bicuspid aortic valve, pregnancy, cardiac surgery during pregnancy, strategy of medical support of pregnant women with BAV, multidisciplinary care, maternal consequences, perinatal consequences, indications for BAV surgery during pregnancy


Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease. Severe stenosis of BAV and its combination with aortic pathology can cause significant adverse maternal and perinatal consequences. The optimal strategy for medical care of pregnant women with BAV has not been fully elucidated and requires further research. This paper presents 7.5 years of work experience of a multidisciplinary team of experts in obstetric cardiology and cardiac surgery in the medical care of pregnant women with BAV and co-existing pathology of the heart and aorta. The experience is based on modern international guidelines, our own research efforts and hospital protocols. Primary expert cardiac screening of 2,469 pregnant women revealed 4.3% of patients (n=106) with BAV. The choice of the strategy for their care was personalized and based on the degree of BAV lesions, any concomitant pathology of the heart and aorta, symptoms and life-threatening conditions. The article analyzes the experience of medical care of pregnant patients with BAV bearing high cardiovascular risk (n=24), presents indications for a certain type of medical care, method and place of birth before cardiac surgery during pregnancy. The types and optimal time for performing interventions during pregnancy and the postpartum period were discussed. Perinatal losses (n=3) were analyzed. The chosen strategy is effective, as evidenced by the absence of negative maternal consequences in the immediate and long-term follow-up period.


  1. Solomenchuk TM, Kravchenko IM, Biliavka IV. [Disease of the bicuspid aortic valve: features of formation and course (literature review and own data)]. Practychna Anhiolohiia. 2012;3-4(52-53):56-60. Ukrainian.
  2. Tutar E, Ekici F, Atalay S, Nacar N. The prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in newborns by echocardiographic screening. Am Heart J. 2005;150(3):513-515.
  3. Mordi I, Tzemos N. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:196037.
  4. Murphy ES, Rösch J, Rahimtoola SH. Frequency and significance of coronary arterial dominance in isolated aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Apr;39(4):505-509.
  5. Fedak PW, Verma S, David TE, Leask RL, Weisel RD, Butany J. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2002 Aug 20;106(8):900-904.
  6. Milewicz DM, Regalado E. Heritable Thoracic Aortic Disease Overview. 2003 Feb 13 [updated 2017 Dec 14]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews ® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2020. Available from:
  7. Lansman SL, Goldberg JB, Kai M, Tang GH, Malekan R, Spielvogel D. Aortic surgery in pregnancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;153(2):S44-S48.
  8. Siromakha SO. [Orphan heritable thoracic aortic diseases and pregnancy. Modern outlooks and guidance]. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;(2(39)):69-74. Ukrainian.
  9. Yuan SM. Bicuspid aortic valve in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):476-480.
  10. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Cífková R, De Bonis M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 7;39(34):3165-3241.
  11. Siromakha SO, Davydova YuV, Tarnavska AO, Volkova NI, Nakonechna NB. [Strategy of medical care for pregnant women with congenital heart disease]. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;(1(42)):64-69. Ukrainian.
  12. Siromakha SO, Davydova YV, Limanska AY, Cherpak BV, Lazoryshynets VV. [Cardiosurgical endovascular intervention during pregnancy]. Klinicheskaia Khirurgiia. 2020;87(3-4):49-54. Ukrainian.
  13. Kapoor MC. Cardiopulmonary bypass in pregnancy. Ann Card Anaesth. 2014;17(1):33-39.
  14. Agarwal RC, Bhattacharya PK, Bhattacharya Lata, Jain RK. Pregnancy and cardiopulmonary bypass. Indian J. Anaesth. 2004;48(4):259-263.
  15. McKay RG. The mansfield scientific aortic valvuloplasty registry: Overview of acute hemodynamic results and procedural complications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Feb;17(2):485-91.
  16. Alkhouli M, Zack CJ, Sarraf M, Bashir R, Nishimura RA, Eleid MF, et al. Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty. A National Perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5):e004481.
How to Cite
Siromakha, S. O., Davydova, I. V., & Kravchenko, V. I. (2021). Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Pregnancy. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, (2 (43), 49-55.