Aortic Root Enlargement during Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/21.4512/FV059-5662
Keywords: severe aortic stenosis, narrow aortic root, Nicks procedure, prosthesis-patient mismatch, intraoperative measurement of the ring

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement is a gold standard in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis or combined aortic pathology. However, aortic valve pathology is often associated with a narrow aortic orifice, particularly in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In 1978, Rahimtoola first described the term of prosthesis-patient mismatch. He noted that effective orifice area of the prosthesis is smaller than that of the native valve. To minimize this complication, there are several surgical strategies: aortic root enlargement (ARE), implantation of a frameless biological prosthesis in the native position, neocuspidalization procedure, Ross procedure, aortic root replacement with xenograft or homograft. ARE is an excellent option, however, some authors outline additional perioperative risks.

The aim. To analyze immediate results of ARE during isolated aortic valve replacement and in cases when it is combined with other heart pathologies.

Materials and methods. Our study included 63 patients who underwent ARE. Isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in the majority of cases, but often aortic root replacement procedure was combined with coronary artery bypass grafting.

Results and discussion. One of 63 patients died (hospital mortality 1.6%) at an early hospital stage (30 postoperative days). Measurement of the aortic valve ring was performed by two methods, through preoperative echocardiography and perioperative measurement using a valve sizer. However, perioperative dimension was chosen as the basis for the calculations. In 62 patients, the perioperative diameter of the aortic valve ring ranged from 19 to 23 mm, only one patient had a diameter of 24 mm. According to our findings, ARE enabled to achieve an average aortic ring size increase of 2.68 cm2 (from 1.5 to 3.4 cm2) and to prevent prosthesis-patient mismatch in 42 (66.7%) cases.

Conclusions. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is considered a serious complication in the postoperative period. Narrow aortic root is a common pathology that should be considered during surgery. ARE is a safe procedure and is not associated with an increased risk of mortality and complications.

References

  1. Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, Ruel M, Al-Atassi T, Dumont E, Mohammadi S, Bernier M, Pibarot P, Rodés-Cabau J. Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus. Circulation. 2019;139(23):2685-702. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408
  2. Dahou A, Mahjoub H, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016;18(11):67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-016-0488-0
  3. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006;92(8):1022-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.067363
  4. David TE, Uden DE. Aortic Valve Replacement in Adult Patients with Small Aortic Annuli. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36(5):577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60689-3
  5. Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970;25(3):339-46. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.25.3.339
  6. Ghoneim A, Bouhout I, Demers P, Mazine A, Francispillai M, El-Hamamsy I, Carrier M, Lamarche Y, Bouchard D. Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: A comparative study among different biological options. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(4):1019-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.058
  7. Bahlmann E, Cramariuc D, Minners J, Lønnebakken MT, Ray S, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Nienaber CA, Jander N, Seifert R, Chambers JB, Kuck KH, Gerdts E. Small aortic root in aortic valve stenosis: clinical characteristics and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.2017;18(4):404-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew159
  8. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG. Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(5):1036-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.028
  9. Massias SA, Pittams A, Mohamed M, Ahmed S, Younas H, Harky A. Aortic root enlargement: When and how. J Card Surg. 2021;36(1):229-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15175
  10. Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, Masters RG, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Enlargement of the Small Aortic Root during Aortic Valve Replacement: Is There a Benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.058
  11. Kulik A, Burwash IG, Kapila V, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Long-Term Outcomes After Valve Replacement for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I553-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001180
  12. Rocha RV, Manlhiot C, Feindel CM, Yau TM, Mueller B, David TE, Ouzounian M. Surgical Enlargement of the Aortic Root Does Not Increase the Operative Risk of Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation. 2018;137(15):1585-94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030525
  13. Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, Edvardsen T, Delgado V, Dulgheru R, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(6):589-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew025
  14. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108(8):983-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000085167.67105.32
  15. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, Birkmeyer NJ, Lemmer JH Jr, Miller DC, Butchart EG, Rizzoli G, Yacoub M, Chai A. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):783-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00591-9
Published
2021-12-22
How to Cite
Furman, M. M., Varbanets, S. V., & Dovgan, O. M. (2021). Aortic Root Enlargement during Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, (4 (45), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/21.4512/FV059-5662
Issue
Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery No 4 (45) 2021
Section
ACQUIRED HEART DISEASES