Minimizing Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Catheter-Based Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Safety and Efficacy
Abstract
Pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency ablation is the most common method of catheter treatment for atrial fibrillation. Performing this procedure involves the use of X-ray radiation, which at certain stages of the procedure is an indispensable method for navigation and visualization of intracardiac structures. Approaches to minimize X-ray exposure during catheter interventions are attracting increased attention of the electrophysiology community due to the potential risks of adverse effects of ionizing radiation on patients and medical personnel.
The aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of performing the pulmonary vein isolation procedure with the intention to minimize X-ray exposure of patients and medical personnel.
Materials and methods. Forty-three patients with various forms of atrial fibrillation were selected for the study: 28(65%) with paroxysmal and 15 (35%) with persistent forms. All the patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation usingcatheter radiofrequency ablation with the intention to minimize X-ray exposure at the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery in the period from June 2023 to April 2024.
Results. In all 43 patients it was possible to electrically isolate all the veins. Catheter ablation of the cavotricuspidisthmus was performed in 5 (31.2%) patients from group A (“Zero-fluoro”), 7 (33.3%) from group B (“Near Zero-fluoro”) and 3 (50%) from group C (“Non Zero-fluoro”) (p = 0.696). Intraoperative reconnection of the pulmonary veins with the left atrium was observed in 6 (37.5%) patients of group A, 11 (52.3%) of group B, and 4 (66%) of group C (p = 0.429). X-ray time for transseptal puncture did not differ between groups A and B (3.56 ± 2.37 vs. 3.69 ± 2.3 min., p = 0.532), however, X-ray time for pulmonary vein isolation in group A was significantly less than that in group B (0.27 ± 0.13 vs. 1.96 ± 1.21 min., p < 0.001). The total time in the left atrium was not statistically different between these two groups (81.33 ± 22.32 vs. 98.6 ± 29.83 min., p = 0.106). In group C (“Non Zero-fluoro”), the aforementioned parameters were not recorded. Total dose area product (DAP) and total radiation dose, as well as total X-ray time and total procedure time, were significantly lower when using the ionizing exposure minimization approach. DAP and total radiation dose in group A were the lowest (7.29 ± 5.16 Gy/cm2 and 76.62 ± 70.82 mGy, respectively) and significantly differed from those in group C (107.67 ± 97.59 Gy/cm2 and 882.32 ± 868.62 mGy, p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). No intraoperative complications were observed in the studied sample.
Conclusions. Minimizing X-ray exposure using modern navigation systems during pulmonary vein isolation using catheter radiofrequency ablation is not associated with increased intraprocedural complications in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. This approach allows you to significantly lower total DAP and the radiation dosewithout increasing the time of performing the pulmonary vein isolation procedure.
References
2. Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, et al. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2024 Mar 30;26(4):euae043. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae043
3. Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, et al.; Peer Review Committee Members. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(1):e1-e156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193
4. Preda A, Bonvicini E, Coradello E, Testoni A, Gigli L, Baroni M, et al. The Fluoroless Future in Electrophysiology: A State-of-the-Art Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 14;14(2):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020182
5. Sommer P, Sciacca V, Anselmino M, Tilz R, Bourier F, Lehrmann H, et al. Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review. Europace. 2023 Jul 4;25(7):euad191. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad191
6. Gutierrez-Barrios A, Cañadas-Pruaño D, Noval-Morillas I, Gheorghe L, Zayas-Rueda R, Calle-Perez G. Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations. World J Cardiol. 2022;14(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v14.i1.1
7. Sugrue A, Le KY, Dearani P, Asirvatham SJ. Minimizing Radiation-Why Aren’t We Down to Zero? J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018;9(8):3271-3273. https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2018.090807
8. Rogers AJ, Brodt CR. Minimizing Radiation in the ModernElectrophysiology Laboratory. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018;9(8):3265-3270. https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2018.090805
9. Estner HL, Deisenhofer I, Luik A, Ndrepepa G, von Bary C, Zrenner B, et al. Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation: reduction of fluoroscopy exposure and procedure duration by the use of a non-fluoroscopic navigation system (NavX). Europace. 2006;8(8):583-587. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eul079
10. Tahin T, Riba A, Nemeth B, Arvai F, Lupkovics G, Szeplaki G,et al. Implementation of a zero fluoroscopic workflow using a simplified intracardiac echocardiography guided method for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, including repeat procedures. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Aug 26;21(1):407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02219-8
11. Zhang G, Cheng L, Liang Z, Zhang J, Dong R, Hang F, et al. Zero-fluoroscopy transseptal puncture guided by right atrial electroanatomical mapping combined with intracardiac echocardiography: A single-center experience. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(9):1009-1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23401
12. Hang F, Cheng L, Liang Z, Dong R, Wang X, Wang Z, et al. Study on the Curative Effect and Safety of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation via Zero-Fluoroscopy Transseptal Puncture under the Dual Guidance of Electroanatomical Mapping and Intracardiac Echocardiography. Cardiol Res Pract. 2021 May 24;2021:5561574. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5561574
13. Huang HD, Abid QU, Ravi V, Sharma P, Larsen T, Krishnan K, et al. Meta-analysis of pulmonary vein isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation conventional vs low- and zero-fluoroscopy approaches. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(6):1403-1412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14450
14. Zei PC, Quadros KK, Clopton P, Thosani A, Ferguson J, Brodt C, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Minimal- versus Zero-fluoroscopy Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Prospective Study. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020;11(11):4281-4291. https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2020.111105
15. Debreceni D, Janosi K, Bocz B, Turcsan M, Lukacs R, Simor T, et al. Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 16;10:1178783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1178783
16. Jan M, Žižek D, Kuhelj D, Lakič N, Prolič Kalinšek T, Štublar J, et al. Combined use of electro-anatomic mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography to achieve zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a single centre experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;36(3):415-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01727-1
17. Bulava A, Hanis J, Eisenberger M. Catheter Ablation ofAtrial Fibrillation Using Zero-Fluoroscopy Technique: A Randomized Trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38(7):797-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12634
18. Kottmaier M, Popa M, Bourier F, Reents T, Cifuentes J, Semmler V, et al. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2020;22(3):388-393. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz342
19. Ali M, Padmanabhan D, Kanjwal K, Ghadei MK, Kottayan A, Banavalikar B, Shenthar J. Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures. J Arrhythm. 2021;37(1):97-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12496
