Whether aortic valve repairs are a reasonable substitute for replacement in children? EXPERT REVIEW
Keywords:
aortic valve repair, children, reoperation
Abstract
Literature review analysis is accomplished relating to the alternativeness of aortic valve (AoV) repairs in children of various ages with AoV disease. Long- and midterm results of AoV repairs in children both with severe aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis are outlined. Several advantages and feasibility of AoV repairs over aortic valve replacement accentuating on the individualization of surgical repair strategy to the age of the patient, durability of the repair depending on material properties, growth potential and geometry of AoV are substantiated.
References
1. Valvesparing root reimplantation and leaflet repair in a bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with the 3-cusp David procedure / Bavaria J. E., Desai N., Szeto W. Y. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2015. – Vol. 149. – 2 P. 2–8.
2. Long-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair / Svensson L. G., Al Kindi A. H., Vivacqua A. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 97. – P. 1539–47; discussion 48.
3. Complex aortic valve repair as a durable and effective alternative to valve replacement in children with aortic valve disease / Tweddell J. S., Pelech A. N., Frommelt P. C. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 129. – P. 551–8.
4. The long-term outcome of open valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in neonates / Hraska V., Sinzobahamvya N., Haun C. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 94. – P. 1519–26.
5. Baird C. W., Myers P. O., del Nido P. J. Aortic valve reconstruction in the young infants and children // Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. – 2012. – Vol. 15. – P. 9–19.
6. Outcomes after operations for bicuspid aortic valve disease in the pediatric population / Siddiqui J., Brizard C. P., Konstantinov I. E. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2013. – Vol. 96. – P. 2175–83.
7. Contemporary results of aortic valve repair for congenital disease: lessons for management and staged strategy / Vergnat M., Asfour B., Arenz C. et al. // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2017. – Vol. 52. – P. 581–7.
8. Mitral disease: the real burden for Ross-Konno procedure in children / Vergnat M., Roubertie F., Lambert V. et al. // AnnThorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 98. – P. 2165–71.
9. The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30-year results from a single institution / Karamlou T., Shen I., Alsoufia B. et al. // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 27. – P. 81–5.
10. Karl T. R. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction: justification for a more definitive repair in the neonate? // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 42. – P. 694–5.
11. Surgical aortic valvotomy in infancy: impact of leaflet morphology on long-term outcomes / Bhabra M. S., Dhillon R., Bhudia S. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2003. – Vol. 76.– P. 1412–6.
12. A total of 404 cases of aortic valve reconstruction with glutaraldehydetreated autologous pericardium / Ozaki S., Kawase I., Yamashita H. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 147. – P. 301–6.
13. Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: An update on the German Dutch Ross Registry / Charitos E. I., Takkenberg J. J., Hanke T. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 144. – P. 813–21; discussion 21–3.
14. Longterm survival and reintervention after the ross procedure across the pediatric age spectrum / Nelson J. S., Pasquali S. K., Pratt C. N. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2015. – Vol. 99. – P. 2086–94.
15. Hitendu D, Christoph M, Rene P et al. Dilatation and dysfunction of the neo-aortic root and in 76 patients after the Ross procedure / Corina A. Z., Roland W., Matthias G. et al. // Pediatr Cardiol. – 2016. – Vol. 37. – P. 1175–1183.
16. Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children / Masuda M., Kado H., Ando Y. et al. // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2008.– Vol. 34. – P. 42–7.
2. Long-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair / Svensson L. G., Al Kindi A. H., Vivacqua A. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 97. – P. 1539–47; discussion 48.
3. Complex aortic valve repair as a durable and effective alternative to valve replacement in children with aortic valve disease / Tweddell J. S., Pelech A. N., Frommelt P. C. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 129. – P. 551–8.
4. The long-term outcome of open valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in neonates / Hraska V., Sinzobahamvya N., Haun C. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 94. – P. 1519–26.
5. Baird C. W., Myers P. O., del Nido P. J. Aortic valve reconstruction in the young infants and children // Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. – 2012. – Vol. 15. – P. 9–19.
6. Outcomes after operations for bicuspid aortic valve disease in the pediatric population / Siddiqui J., Brizard C. P., Konstantinov I. E. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2013. – Vol. 96. – P. 2175–83.
7. Contemporary results of aortic valve repair for congenital disease: lessons for management and staged strategy / Vergnat M., Asfour B., Arenz C. et al. // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2017. – Vol. 52. – P. 581–7.
8. Mitral disease: the real burden for Ross-Konno procedure in children / Vergnat M., Roubertie F., Lambert V. et al. // AnnThorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 98. – P. 2165–71.
9. The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30-year results from a single institution / Karamlou T., Shen I., Alsoufia B. et al. // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 27. – P. 81–5.
10. Karl T. R. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction: justification for a more definitive repair in the neonate? // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 42. – P. 694–5.
11. Surgical aortic valvotomy in infancy: impact of leaflet morphology on long-term outcomes / Bhabra M. S., Dhillon R., Bhudia S. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2003. – Vol. 76.– P. 1412–6.
12. A total of 404 cases of aortic valve reconstruction with glutaraldehydetreated autologous pericardium / Ozaki S., Kawase I., Yamashita H. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 147. – P. 301–6.
13. Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: An update on the German Dutch Ross Registry / Charitos E. I., Takkenberg J. J., Hanke T. et al. // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 144. – P. 813–21; discussion 21–3.
14. Longterm survival and reintervention after the ross procedure across the pediatric age spectrum / Nelson J. S., Pasquali S. K., Pratt C. N. et al. // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2015. – Vol. 99. – P. 2086–94.
15. Hitendu D, Christoph M, Rene P et al. Dilatation and dysfunction of the neo-aortic root and in 76 patients after the Ross procedure / Corina A. Z., Roland W., Matthias G. et al. // Pediatr Cardiol. – 2016. – Vol. 37. – P. 1175–1183.
16. Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children / Masuda M., Kado H., Ando Y. et al. // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2008.– Vol. 34. – P. 42–7.
Published
2018-11-30
How to Cite
Abdurakhmanov, Z. M., Varbanets, S. V., & Yemets, I. N. (2018). Whether aortic valve repairs are a reasonable substitute for replacement in children? EXPERT REVIEW. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, (4 (33), 54-56. https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/18.33/13(054-056)
Section
CONGENITAL HEART DEFECTS
