Left Ventricular Remodeling after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Acute Heart Failure

Keywords: cardiac remodeling, echocardiography, diastolic dysfunction, pulmonary edema, myocardial revascularization

Abstract

The aim. To establish the relationship between structural-functional and laboratory parameters in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure (HF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Materials and methods. We examined 308 MI patients who were divided into 3 groups: 161 patients without signs of acute heart failure (AHF) (group I), 99 with Killip class II-III AHF (group II) and 48 with Killip class IV (cardiogenic shock) (group III). All the patients underwent general clinical examinations: complete blood count, lipid profile, creati-nine, quantitative determination of troponin I, D-dimer, creatine kinase-MB, electrocardiography, coronary angiography with PCI, focused cardiac ultrasound and standard echocardiography over 3-5 days.

Results. According to the focused cardiac ultrasound, the majority of MI patients with signs of AHF had preserved left ventricle function, and only 8.2% of patients had left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) ˂40%. The most significant structural and functional changes were observed in group II. After PCI, a significant increase in left ventricle contractility was found in all groups, but in the group II, the increase in LVEF was more pronounced. The severity of HF manifestations increased depending on the severity of diastolic dysfunction.

Many correlations were established: an inverse relationship between LVEF and the presence of HF, the number ofaffected vessels, proximal left anterior descending artery lesions, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and atrium fibrilla-tion; a direct relationship between LVEF and hemoglobin levels and glomerular filtration rate.

Conclusions. The vast majority of patients with MI and signs of AHF had preserved left ventricle contractile function. High-grade HF manifestations increase depending on the severity of diastolic dysfunction. Myocardial revascularization in MI pa-tients significantly improves functional and volumetric parameters of myocardial function. Numerous correlations between structural-functional and laboratory parameters in patients with MI and HF who underwent PCI have been established.

References

  1. Kovalenko VM, Kornatsky VM. [Health status of the people of Ukraine and tertiary level medical care: a manual]. Kyiv; 2019. p. 95-96. Ukrainian.
  2. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(36):3599-3726. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368
  3. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: Developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720-3826. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
  4. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
  5. Spencer KT, Flachskampf FA. Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7 Pt 1):1243-1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.036
  6. Thiele H, Ohman EM, de Waha-Thiele S, Zeymer U, Desch S. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019. Eur Heart J.2019;40(32):2671-2683. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz363
  7. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(16):e232-e268. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525
  8. Henein MY, Lindqvist P. Diastolic function assessment by echocardiography: A practical manual for clinical use and future applications. Echocardiography. 2020;37(11):1908-1918. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14698
  9. Vergaro G, Ghionzoli N, Innocenti L, Taddei C, Giannoni A, Valleggi A, et al. Noncardiac Versus Cardiac Mortality in Heart Failure With Preserved, Midrange, and Reduced Ejection Fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct 15;8(20):e013441. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013441
  10. Lee JG, Beom JW, Choi JH, Kim SY, Kim KS, Joo SJ. Pseudonormal or Restrictive Filling Pattern of Left Ventricle Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Presenting as Acute Heart Failure. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;26(4):217-225. https://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2018.26.e22
Published
2024-06-27
How to Cite
1.
Obertynska OG, Rasputina LV, Didenko DV, Solomonchuk AV. Left Ventricular Remodeling after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Acute Heart Failure. ujcvs [Internet]. 2024Jun.27 [cited 2024Dec.26];32(2):38-4. Available from: https://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/645