Preoperative Factors Influencing the Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Reduced Left Ventricular Myocardial Contractility

  • S. A. Rudenko National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-713X
  • Y. V. Kaschenko National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-8262
  • L. A. Klimenko National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N. S. Osipenko National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • A. V. Rudenko National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-1613
  • O. V. Yuvchyk National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Keywords: myocardial infarction, preoperative condition factors, reduced left ventricular myocardial contractility

Abstract

Myocardial infarction remains one of the most common causes of disability in patients. Prior myocardial infarction in 15–30% of cases leads to decrease in left ventricle (LV) contractility. Isolated drug therapy is ineffective in most cases – impressions of the coronary arteries require revascularization, including coronary artery bypass grafting. Data on the choice of optimal tactics in such patients is also limited. In addition, there is no consensus on the prognosis of mortality and management of this group of patients.

Materials and methods. The study included 190 patients with the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF LV) of 35% or less, who underwent CABG at the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine in the period from 01.01.2015 to 31.12.2018. The age of patients ranged from 29 to 83 years (61.13 ± 8.87). There were 170 men (89.47%) and 20 women (10.53%). Our data suggests that patients with low EF LV have complications typical of coronary artery bypass grafting, but the incidence of these complications is higher and increases with the EF LV decrease (except for the central nervous system (CNS) complications where there is no correlation). At the same time, such indicators as the duration of mechanical ventilation, the number of days of stay in the intensive care unit and the total number of days of stay in the hospital are increasing. The following complications most often arose in the postoperative period: acute heart failure, respiratory failure, renal failure.

Based on our data, we came to the following conclusions: in patients with reduced LV myocardial contractility, the main complications after coronary artery bypass grafting were congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, renal failure and CNS complications. Among them, regardless of the level of EF LV, the most common were acute heart failure and complications of the respiratory system. The most significant factors of preoperative condition of patients with reduced LV myocardial contractility, which increase the risk of postoperative complications and increased mortality are: EF LV 30% and below, patient age over 60 years, creatinine rise to >200 mmol/L, pulmonary hypertension over 50 mmHg. Concomitant mitral regurgitation (moderate or severe) requires obligatory intraoperative correction.

References

  1. Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Fremes SE, Ivanov J, David TE, Goldman BS, Salerno TA. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor ventricular function. Cardiovascular Surgeons of the University of Toronto. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Jun;103(6):1083-91; discussion 1091-2.
  2. Hayward PA, Buxton BF. Contemporary coronary graft patency: 5-year observational data from a randomized trial of conduits. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Sep;84(3):795-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.028
  3. Reents W, Zacher M, Boergermann J, Kappert U, Hilker M, Färber G, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Stroke-Exploratory Analysis of the GOPCABE Trial and Methodological Considerations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;66(6):464-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636936
  4. Skorpil J, Brát R, Docekal B, Motyka O. Myocardial revascularisation in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Early and midterm results. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2004 Jul;148(1):55-8. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2004.009
  5. Palmer G, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Williams JL, Magee MJ, Brown P, et al. Coronary artery revascularization (CARE) Registry: an observational study of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):986-91; discussion 991-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.057
  6. Ferguson TB Jr, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL; STS National Database Committee. A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann. Thorac Surg. 2002 Feb;73(2):480-9; discussion 489-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03339-2
  7. Weightman WM, Gibbs NM, Sheminant MR, Thackray NM, Newman MA. Risk prediction in coronary artery surgery: a comparison of four risk scores. Med J Aust. 1997 Apr 21;166(8):408-11.
  8. Orr RK, Maini BS, Sottile FD, Dumas EM, O’Mara P. A comparison of four severity-adjusted models to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Surg. 1995 Mar;130(3):301-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030071015
  9. Petrie MC, Jhund PS, She L, Adlbrecht C, Doenst T, Panza JA, et al.; STICH Trial Investigators. Ten-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting according to age in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: an analysis of the extended follow-up of the STICH trial (surgical treatment for ischemic heart failure). Circulation. 2016 Nov 1;134(18):1314-24. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024800
  10. Dos Santos ER, Lopes CT, Maria VL, de Barros AL. Risk factors for decreased cardiac output after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Apr;16(4):352-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515116681373
  11. Kirmani BH, Holmes MV, Muir AD. Long-term survival and freedom from reintervention after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched study. Circulation. 2016 Oct 25;134(17):1209-20. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021933
  12. American Association for Thoracic Surgery Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee, Kron IL, Acker MA, Adams DH, Ailawadi G, Bolling SF, Hung JW,etal.2015TheAmericanAssociationforThoracicSurgery Consensus Guidelines: Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):940-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.127
  13. Руденко СА, Тромбовецька ОМ, Гогаєва ОК, Танський ВГ, Руденко АВ. Причини виникнення післяінфарктної недостатності мітрального клапана. Вісник серцево-судинної хірургії. 2016;2(25):18-21.
  14. Rudenko SA, Trembovetstka OM, Gogayeva OK, Tanskyi VG, Rudenko AV. [The mechanisms of ischemic mitral insufficiency]. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;2(25):18-21. Ukrainian.
  15. Руденко АВ, Руденко СА, Гогаева ЕК, Гутовский ВВ, Руденко НЛ, Демус ВВ и др. Результаты хирургического лечения митральной недостаточности ишемического генеза. Вісник серцево-судинної хірургії. 2014;1(22):296-300.
  16. Rudenko AV, Rudenko SA, Gogayeva EK, Gutovsky VV, RudenkoML,DemusVV,etal.[ResultsofSurgicalTreatment Of Mitral Insufficiency of Ischemic Genesis]. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;1(22):296-300. Russian.
Published
2020-09-18
How to Cite
1.
Rudenko SA, Kaschenko YV, Klimenko LA, Osipenko NS, Rudenko AV, Yuvchyk OV. Preoperative Factors Influencing the Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Reduced Left Ventricular Myocardial Contractility. ujcvs [Internet]. 2020Sep.18 [cited 2024Dec.22];(3 (40):38-2. Available from: https://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/364